As of 2026-03-29, 302美白镭射瓶's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 302美白镭射瓶's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
302美白镭射瓶's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
302美白镭射瓶's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
302美白镭射瓶's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
302美白镭射瓶's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
302美白镭射瓶's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 谷谷雨净白瓶 | 36.36% | 18.18% | 28.57% | 34.55% | 12.73% | View Details |
| 修修丽可 | 29.09% | 0% | 0% | 25.45% | 5.45% | View Details |
| 发发光瓶 | 12.73% | 0% | 0% | 10.91% | 0% | View Details |
| 修修丽可色修精华 | 7.27% | 0% | 0% | 7.27% | 7.27% | View Details |
| 3377精华 | 5.45% | 0% | 0% | 5.45% | 0% | View Details |
| 安安白瓶 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 3302美白镭射瓶 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
