As of 2026-03-31, 377亮白棒次抛精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 9.26%, above the industry average by 6.7 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (9.26%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 377亮白棒次抛精华's overall mention rate surpasses 2 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
377亮白棒次抛精华's Mention Rate is 9.26%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
377亮白棒次抛精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
377亮白棒次抛精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
377亮白棒次抛精华's Positive Rate is 9.26%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
377亮白棒次抛精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 谷谷雨净白瓶 | 31.48% | 16.67% | 23.81% | 29.63% | 11.11% | View Details |
| 城城野医生377精华 | 11.11% | 0% | 0% | 11.11% | 3.7% | View Details |
| 发发光瓶 | 11.11% | 0% | 0% | 11.11% | 0% | View Details |
| 双双抗精华（特证版） | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 9.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 3377亮白棒次抛精华 (Current Brand) | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 9.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 3377精华 | 7.41% | 0% | 0% | 7.41% | 0% | View Details |
| 娇娇韵诗小瓷瓶 | 5.56% | 0% | 0% | 5.56% | 0% | View Details |
