As of 2026-03-30, 377美白次抛精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 377美白次抛精华's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
377美白次抛精华's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
377美白次抛精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
377美白次抛精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
377美白次抛精华's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
377美白次抛精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发发光瓶 | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 7.41% | 0% | View Details |
| OOLAY水光小白瓶 | 7.41% | 3.7% | 14.29% | 7.41% | 0% | View Details |
| 安安白瓶 | 1.85% | 0% | 0% | 1.85% | 0% | View Details |
| 3302镭射瓶 | 1.85% | 0% | 0% | 1.85% | 0% | View Details |
| 香香奈儿 | 1.85% | 0% | 0% | 1.85% | 0% | View Details |
| 小小白瓶 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 3377美白次抛精华 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
