As of 2026-03-31, 377系列's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 1.85%, below the industry average by 4.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (1.85%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 377系列's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
377系列's Mention Rate is 1.85%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
377系列's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
377系列's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
377系列's Positive Rate is 1.85%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
377系列's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOlay | 40.74% | 1.85% | 4.76% | 37.04% | 14.81% | View Details |
| 韩韩束 | 29.63% | 25.93% | 0% | 29.63% | 0% | View Details |
| 妮妮维雅 | 20.37% | 0% | 0% | 20.37% | 3.7% | View Details |
| 发发光瓶 | 11.11% | 0% | 0% | 11.11% | 0% | View Details |
| 双双抗精华（特证版） | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 9.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 镭镭射瓶 | 5.56% | 0% | 0% | 5.56% | 0% | View Details |
| 3377系列 (Current Brand) | 1.85% | 0% | 0% | 1.85% | 0% | View Details |
