As of 2026-03-30, 3M ProShield系列's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 工装鞋 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 3M ProShield系列's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
3M ProShield系列's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
3M ProShield系列's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
3M ProShield系列's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
3M ProShield系列's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
3M ProShield系列's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRed Wing | 60.71% | 42.86% | 52.38% | 60.71% | 21.43% | View Details |
| CCAT | 46.43% | 3.57% | 0% | 42.86% | 10.71% | View Details |
| WWolverine | 41.07% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 41.07% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 蓝蓝鸥盾 | 32.14% | 8.93% | 0% | 32.14% | 5.36% | View Details |
| TTimberland PRO | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 3.57% | View Details |
| DDickies | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 0% | View Details |
| 33M ProShield系列 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
