As of 2026-03-31, AI辅助编码工具's data on the DeepSeek platform in the AI辅助编码 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 18.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, AI辅助编码工具's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
AI辅助编码工具's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
AI辅助编码工具's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
AI辅助编码工具's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
AI辅助编码工具's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
AI辅助编码工具's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCursor | 91.84% | 32.65% | 35.71% | 89.8% | 40.82% | View Details |
| TTrae | 8.16% | 0% | 0% | 8.16% | 4.08% | View Details |
| JJetBrains | 6.12% | 0% | 0% | 6.12% | 0% | View Details |
| CCopilot | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| CCline | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| GGemini | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| AAI辅助编码工具 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
