As of 2026-03-31, 矮人矿坑's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 矮人矿坑's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
矮人矿坑's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
矮人矿坑's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
矮人矿坑's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
矮人矿坑's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
矮人矿坑's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 孩孩之宝 | 38.3% | 27.66% | 17.65% | 38.3% | 4.26% | View Details |
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 31.91% | 10.64% | 29.41% | 29.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 游游卡桌游 | 17.02% | 2.13% | 0% | 14.89% | 2.13% | View Details |
| 《《地产大亨》 | 17.02% | 0% | 0% | 12.77% | 2.13% | View Details |
| HHABA | 12.77% | 0% | 0% | 12.77% | 6.38% | View Details |
| 卡卡坦岛 | 12.77% | 0% | 0% | 8.51% | 0% | View Details |
| 矮矮人矿坑 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
