As of 2026-04-01, Anthropic's data on the DeepSeek platform in the AI辅助编码 category shows: The overall mention rate is 4.65%, below the industry average by 0.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (4.65%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Anthropic's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Anthropic's Mention Rate is 4.65%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Anthropic's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Anthropic's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Anthropic's Positive Rate is 4.65%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Anthropic's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGitHub Copilot | 90.7% | 39.53% | 33.33% | 86.05% | 34.88% | View Details |
| CCursor | 90.7% | 27.91% | 25% | 88.37% | 41.86% | View Details |
| 通通义灵码 | 44.19% | 2.33% | 0% | 44.19% | 13.95% | View Details |
| CClaude Code | 44.19% | 2.33% | 0% | 39.53% | 27.91% | View Details |
| CCodeium | 32.56% | 0% | 0% | 30.23% | 4.65% | View Details |
| 文文心快码 | 27.91% | 4.65% | 0% | 27.91% | 2.33% | View Details |
| AAnthropic (Current Brand) | 4.65% | 0% | 0% | 4.65% | 0% | View Details |
