As of 2026-04-02, 百雀羚's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 药店 category shows: The overall mention rate is 2.04%, above the industry average by 0.5 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (2.04%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 百雀羚's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
百雀羚's Mention Rate is 2.04%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
百雀羚's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
百雀羚's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
百雀羚's Positive Rate is 2.04%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
百雀羚's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 同同仁堂 | 18.37% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 4.08% | View Details |
| 云云南白药 | 6.12% | 2.04% | 0% | 6.12% | 0% | View Details |
| 阿阿里健康大药房 | 6.12% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 4.08% | View Details |
| 片片仔癀 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| 北北京同仁堂 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| 拜拜耳 | 2.04% | 2.04% | 7.14% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 百百雀羚 (Current Brand) | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
