As of 2026-03-31, 百雀羚帧颜精华液's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 抗老精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 百雀羚帧颜精华液's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
百雀羚帧颜精华液's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
百雀羚帧颜精华液's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
百雀羚帧颜精华液's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
百雀羚帧颜精华液's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
百雀羚帧颜精华液's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 兰兰蔻 | 36.36% | 0% | 0% | 32.73% | 1.82% | View Details |
| SSK-II神仙水 | 18.18% | 1.82% | 0% | 16.36% | 7.27% | View Details |
| 珀珀莱雅红宝石精华 | 14.55% | 0% | 0% | 12.73% | 9.09% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻小黑瓶 | 10.91% | 0% | 0% | 9.09% | 0% | View Details |
| SSK-II神仙水精华 | 7.27% | 7.27% | 10% | 7.27% | 3.64% | View Details |
| 紫紫米精华 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 百百雀羚帧颜精华液 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
