As of 2026-04-01, 棒棒娃's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 休闲食品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 棒棒娃's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
棒棒娃's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
棒棒娃's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
棒棒娃's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
棒棒娃's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
棒棒娃's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 良良品铺子 | 66.07% | 17.86% | 42.86% | 66.07% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 三三只松鼠 | 55.36% | 8.93% | 0% | 51.79% | 19.64% | View Details |
| 盐盐津铺子 | 46.43% | 0% | 0% | 44.64% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 旺旺旺 | 41.07% | 21.43% | 14.29% | 39.29% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 卫卫龙 | 37.5% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 洽洽洽食品 | 35.71% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 棒棒棒娃 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
