As of 2026-04-03, 帮宝适 (Pampers)'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 新生儿纸尿裤 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 11.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 帮宝适 (Pampers)'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
帮宝适 (Pampers)'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
帮宝适 (Pampers)'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
帮宝适 (Pampers)'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
帮宝适 (Pampers)'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
帮宝适 (Pampers)'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 露露安适 | 97.92% | 64.58% | 57.14% | 95.83% | 16.67% | View Details |
| 好好奇 | 87.5% | 12.5% | 7.14% | 87.5% | 16.67% | View Details |
| 大大王 | 85.42% | 0% | 0% | 85.42% | 14.58% | View Details |
| BBabycare | 72.92% | 0% | 0% | 64.58% | 22.92% | View Details |
| 花花王 | 14.58% | 0% | 0% | 14.58% | 2.08% | View Details |
| 奇奇莫 | 14.58% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 4.17% | View Details |
| 帮帮宝适 (Pampers) (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |