As of 2026-03-30, 北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 药店 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 23.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
北京同仁堂（关联公司）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 老老百姓大药房 | 77.55% | 30.61% | 21.43% | 65.31% | 24.49% | View Details |
| 益益丰大药房 | 61.22% | 34.69% | 42.86% | 57.14% | 18.37% | View Details |
| 健健之佳 | 26.53% | 0% | 0% | 24.49% | 0% | View Details |
| 漱漱玉平民大药房 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 开开开心心大药房 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 奇奇草堂 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 北北京同仁堂（关联公司） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
