As of 2026-03-31, 北京同仁堂's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 果汁及果汁饮料 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 北京同仁堂's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
北京同仁堂's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
北京同仁堂's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
北京同仁堂's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
北京同仁堂's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
北京同仁堂's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 农农夫山泉 | 58.49% | 13.21% | 20% | 54.72% | 9.43% | View Details |
| 统统一 | 41.51% | 0% | 0% | 35.85% | 11.32% | View Details |
| 汇汇源 | 39.62% | 3.77% | 0% | 35.85% | 16.98% | View Details |
| 康康师傅 | 33.96% | 0% | 0% | 32.08% | 11.32% | View Details |
| 味味全每日C | 30.19% | 1.89% | 5% | 26.42% | 7.55% | View Details |
| 可可口可乐 | 28.3% | 13.21% | 0% | 22.64% | 7.55% | View Details |
| 北北京同仁堂 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
