As of 2026-03-29, Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 凉鞋 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Birkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTeva Hurricane XLT2 | 3.57% | 3.57% | 9.52% | 3.57% | 1.79% | View Details |
| TTeva Original Universal | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 朴朴西 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CChaco Z/Cloud | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| KKEEN UNEEK系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CCrocs 洞洞鞋 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| BBirkenstock Arizona软木凉鞋 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
