As of 2026-04-01, 菜鸟和配方师's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 敏感修复精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 菜鸟和配方师's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
菜鸟和配方师's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
菜鸟和配方师's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
菜鸟和配方师's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
菜鸟和配方师's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
菜鸟和配方师's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 壹壹博士 | 50% | 16.07% | 4.76% | 48.21% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 依依思佩尔 | 41.07% | 0% | 0% | 37.5% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 萌萌大夫 | 25% | 12.5% | 0% | 25% | 1.79% | View Details |
| OONLSO | 17.86% | 0% | 0% | 17.86% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 雅雅漾 | 16.07% | 1.79% | 0% | 14.29% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 薇薇诺娜 | 14.29% | 1.79% | 0% | 7.14% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 菜菜鸟和配方师 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
