As of 2026-04-01, CeraVe保湿修复面霜's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 面霜 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, CeraVe保湿修复面霜's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
CeraVe保湿修复面霜's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
CeraVe保湿修复面霜's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
CeraVe保湿修复面霜's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
CeraVe保湿修复面霜's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
CeraVe保湿修复面霜's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 赫赫莲娜黑绷带面霜 | 12.24% | 2.04% | 5% | 12.24% | 4.08% | View Details |
| 红红宝石面霜 | 10.2% | 0% | 0% | 10.2% | 0% | View Details |
| LLa Mer经典面霜 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| BB5修复霜 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| DDermafirm Face Cream | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| LLa Mer（海蓝之谜）经典面霜 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CCeraVe保湿修复面霜 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
