As of 2026-04-02, 《长城》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 7.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《长城》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《长城》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《长城》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《长城》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《长城》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《长城》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 35.85% | 11.32% | 31.58% | 33.96% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《瘟疫危机》 | 7.55% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《动物叠叠乐》 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《现代艺术》 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《三国杀对战卡》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《三只小猪》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《长城》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
