As of 2026-03-31, 晨光 M&G's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 晨光 M&G's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
晨光 M&G's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
晨光 M&G's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
晨光 M&G's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
晨光 M&G's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
晨光 M&G's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 后后浪 | 5.36% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 5.36% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 华华为 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 小小米 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 得得力 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 掌掌阅 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 晨晨光 M&G (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
