As of 2026-03-29, 成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 设计公司 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 靳靳刘高设计 | 22.45% | 0% | 0% | 22.45% | 0% | View Details |
| 洛洛可可设计 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| 东东道 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| 正正邦 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 2.04% | View Details |
| 韩韩家英设计 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 瑞瑞德设计 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 成成都野趣户外装备外观设计事务所 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
