As of 2026-04-01, 城野医生377美白淡斑精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 城野医生377美白淡斑精华's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
城野医生377美白淡斑精华's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
城野医生377美白淡斑精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
城野医生377美白淡斑精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
城野医生377美白淡斑精华's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
城野医生377美白淡斑精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II | 44% | 4% | 5.26% | 40% | 8% | View Details |
| 谷谷雨净白瓶 | 34% | 20% | 26.32% | 30% | 12% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧 | 28% | 0% | 0% | 26% | 10% | View Details |
| 资资生堂 | 22% | 2% | 0% | 22% | 2% | View Details |
| 娇娇韵诗 | 22% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 2% | View Details |
| 妮妮维雅 | 16% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 4% | View Details |
| 城城野医生377美白淡斑精华 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
