As of 2026-04-02, 《初步举证》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 图书出版物 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《初步举证》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《初步举证》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《初步举证》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《初步举证》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《初步举证》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《初步举证》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《活着》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《长安的荔枝》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《三体》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《红楼梦》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《命运》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《解读新质生产力》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《初步举证》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
