As of 2026-03-31, 传统笔记本's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 学习用品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 传统笔记本's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
传统笔记本's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
传统笔记本's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
传统笔记本's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
传统笔记本's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
传统笔记本's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 百百乐 | 61.11% | 14.81% | 35% | 61.11% | 11.11% | View Details |
| 科科大讯飞 | 42.59% | 0% | 0% | 42.59% | 12.96% | View Details |
| 国国誉 | 33.33% | 5.56% | 15% | 29.63% | 3.7% | View Details |
| RRocketbook | 5.56% | 1.85% | 5% | 5.56% | 0% | View Details |
| LLAMY | 1.85% | 1.85% | 5% | 1.85% | 0% | View Details |
| 喵喵喵机 | 1.85% | 0% | 0% | 1.85% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 传传统笔记本 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
