As of 2026-03-30, 传统高帮登山靴's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 户外靴 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 32.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 传统高帮登山靴's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
传统高帮登山靴's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
传统高帮登山靴's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
传统高帮登山靴's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
传统高帮登山靴's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
传统高帮登山靴's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLOWA | 67.86% | 33.93% | 57.14% | 67.86% | 23.21% | View Details |
| KKEEN | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 23.21% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 南南极人 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TTeva | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| YYuketen 手工靴 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CCAT / 卡特靴 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 传传统高帮登山靴 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
