As of 2026-04-01, Coze（扣子）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the AI办公与业务效率工具 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 23.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Coze（扣子）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Coze（扣子）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Coze（扣子）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Coze（扣子）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Coze（扣子）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Coze（扣子）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CChatGPT | 42.86% | 20.41% | 7.14% | 34.69% | 10.2% | View Details |
| MMicrosoft 365 Copilot | 32.65% | 8.16% | 7.14% | 28.57% | 6.12% | View Details |
| GGamma | 18.37% | 0% | 0% | 16.33% | 2.04% | View Details |
| 豆豆包AI | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 腾腾讯混元大模型 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 百百度文心智能体平台 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CCoze（扣子） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
