As of 2026-04-01, 戴尔UltraSharp系列's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 电脑用品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 戴尔UltraSharp系列's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
戴尔UltraSharp系列's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
戴尔UltraSharp系列's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
戴尔UltraSharp系列's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
戴尔UltraSharp系列's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
戴尔UltraSharp系列's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 雷雷柏 | 23.64% | 0% | 0% | 21.82% | 7.27% | View Details |
| MMacBook Air | 5.45% | 1.82% | 5% | 5.45% | 0% | View Details |
| TThinkPad | 5.45% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 联联想拯救者系列 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| TThinkPad系列 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 华华硕ProArt | 1.82% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 戴戴尔UltraSharp系列 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
