As of 2026-04-03, 得宝160g卷纸's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 卷纸 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 得宝160g卷纸's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
得宝160g卷纸's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
得宝160g卷纸's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
得宝160g卷纸's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
得宝160g卷纸's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
得宝160g卷纸's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 维维达蓝色经典系列 | 4.08% | 0% | 5.56% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达蓝色经典 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 洁洁柔黑Face系列 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达超韧 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 可可心柔乳霜纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达棉韧系列卷纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 得得宝160g卷纸 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
