As of 2026-04-02, 低价杂牌's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 工装鞋 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 低价杂牌's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
低价杂牌's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
低价杂牌's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
低价杂牌's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
低价杂牌's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
低价杂牌's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 霍霍尼韦尔 | 25% | 1.79% | 0% | 25% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 33M | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 红红翼 | 5.36% | 3.57% | 0% | 5.36% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 斯斯凯奇 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 凯凯乐石 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 网网易严选 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 低低价杂牌 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
