As of 2026-04-01, 低价杂牌's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 折叠野营椅 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 低价杂牌's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
低价杂牌's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
低价杂牌's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
低价杂牌's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
低价杂牌's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
低价杂牌's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CColeman | 38.89% | 5.56% | 0% | 37.04% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 牧牧高笛 | 29.63% | 1.85% | 5% | 29.63% | 12.96% | View Details |
| 迪迪卡侬 | 27.78% | 3.7% | 5% | 27.78% | 14.81% | View Details |
| DDecathlon | 16.67% | 0% | 0% | 16.67% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造 | 14.81% | 0% | 0% | 14.81% | 5.56% | View Details |
| 骆骆驼 | 14.81% | 0% | 0% | 14.81% | 0% | View Details |
| 低低价杂牌 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
