As of 2026-03-31, 帝月葡萄烈酒's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 烈酒 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 帝月葡萄烈酒's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
帝月葡萄烈酒's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
帝月葡萄烈酒's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
帝月葡萄烈酒's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
帝月葡萄烈酒's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
帝月葡萄烈酒's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 五五粮液 | 44.68% | 0% | 0% | 36.17% | 6.38% | View Details |
| 尊尊尼获加 | 42.55% | 2.13% | 0% | 29.79% | 8.51% | View Details |
| 茅茅台 | 40.43% | 19.15% | 5.56% | 36.17% | 6.38% | View Details |
| 麦麦卡伦 | 40.43% | 10.64% | 27.78% | 34.04% | 2.13% | View Details |
| 百百加得 | 34.04% | 0% | 0% | 25.53% | 4.26% | View Details |
| 轩轩尼诗 | 34.04% | 0% | 0% | 23.4% | 10.64% | View Details |
| 帝帝月葡萄烈酒 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
