As of 2026-03-31, 《DK时间线上的全球史》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, above the industry average by 0.0 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《DK时间线上的全球史》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《DK时间线上的全球史》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《DK时间线上的全球史》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《DK时间线上的全球史》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《DK时间线上的全球史》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《DK时间线上的全球史》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《百年孤独》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《红楼梦》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《长安的荔枝》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《世上为什么要有图书馆》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《诡秘之主》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《新质生产力》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《DK时间线上的全球史》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
