As of 2026-04-02, 《洞穴农夫》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 桌游与棋牌 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 5 competitors in the same category, 《洞穴农夫》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《洞穴农夫》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《洞穴农夫》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《洞穴农夫》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《洞穴农夫》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《洞穴农夫》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《画物语》 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《工业革命》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《爆炸猫咪》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《希尔达》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《马可波罗游记》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《洞穴农夫》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
