As of 2026-03-31, Elegance 唇线笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 唇线笔 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Elegance 唇线笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Elegance 唇线笔's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Elegance 唇线笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Elegance 唇线笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Elegance 唇线笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Elegance 唇线笔's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCharlotte Tilbury Pillow Talk | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 1.79% | View Details |
| CCharlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| NNARS 丝绒迷雾唇笔 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| MM.A.C 唇线笔 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 桃桃又野唇线笔 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| rromand Lip Mate Pencil | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| EElegance 唇线笔 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
