As of 2026-03-31, EMA关联平台's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 专利检索平台 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, EMA关联平台's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
EMA关联平台's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
EMA关联平台's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
EMA关联平台's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
EMA关联平台's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
EMA关联平台's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPatSnap | 12.24% | 10.2% | 7.14% | 12.24% | 4.08% | View Details |
| IInnoJoy专利搜索引擎 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 国国家知识产权局信息公共服务平台 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 全全球医药专利数据库 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| FFDA数据库 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TThomson Reuters Derwent | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| EEMA关联平台 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
