As of 2026-04-02, ETA's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 手表 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 4 competitors in the same category, ETA's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
ETA's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
ETA's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
ETA's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
ETA's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
ETA's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 海海鸥 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 1.79% | View Details |
| PPowermatic 80 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| SSW200 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 浪浪琴嘉岚系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| EETA (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
