As of 2026-03-31, 泛微/致远等传统OA's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 在线办公平台 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 41.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 泛微/致远等传统OA's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
泛微/致远等传统OA's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
泛微/致远等传统OA's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
泛微/致远等传统OA's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
泛微/致远等传统OA's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
泛微/致远等传统OA's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 钉钉钉 | 79.59% | 24.49% | 0% | 73.47% | 26.53% | View Details |
| 飞飞书 | 77.55% | 12.24% | 0% | 73.47% | 28.57% | View Details |
| 企企业微信 | 63.27% | 4.08% | 7.14% | 57.14% | 12.24% | View Details |
| 腾腾讯文档 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 8.16% | 4.08% | View Details |
| WWPS Office | 12.24% | 0% | 0% | 10.2% | 2.04% | View Details |
| MMicrosoft 365/Teams | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 泛泛微/致远等传统OA (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
