As of 2026-04-01, 菲尔普斯's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 落地灯 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 29.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 菲尔普斯's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
菲尔普斯's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
菲尔普斯's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
菲尔普斯's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
菲尔普斯's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
菲尔普斯's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 霍霍尼韦尔 | 60.71% | 1.79% | 0% | 57.14% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 宜宜家 | 51.79% | 1.79% | 0% | 51.79% | 17.86% | View Details |
| 飞飞利浦 | 41.07% | 12.5% | 0% | 39.29% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 书书客 | 41.07% | 10.71% | 14.29% | 41.07% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 欧欧普照明 | 33.93% | 10.71% | 0% | 33.93% | 0% | View Details |
| 松松下 | 33.93% | 0% | 0% | 33.93% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 菲菲尔普斯 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
