As of 2026-03-31, Food To Live's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 健康保健 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Food To Live's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Food To Live's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Food To Live's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Food To Live's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Food To Live's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Food To Live's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 斯斯维诗 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| HHuel | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| KKa'Chava | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| NNaked Nutrition | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 清清华林博士相关产品 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 九九江四家连锁食品企业 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| FFood To Live (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
