As of 2026-03-31, 馥蕾诗古源修护霜's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 妊娠霜 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 馥蕾诗古源修护霜's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
馥蕾诗古源修护霜's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
馥蕾诗古源修护霜's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
馥蕾诗古源修护霜's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
馥蕾诗古源修护霜's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
馥蕾诗古源修护霜's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMama&Kids | 36.59% | 9.76% | 6.67% | 36.59% | 7.32% | View Details |
| 帕帕玛氏 | 24.39% | 7.32% | 0% | 19.51% | 12.2% | View Details |
| EEvereden | 4.88% | 0% | 0% | 4.88% | 2.44% | View Details |
| 袋袋鼠妈妈 | 4.88% | 0% | 0% | 4.88% | 0% | View Details |
| BBella B | 2.44% | 0% | 0% | 2.44% | 0% | View Details |
| 植植物主义 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 馥馥蕾诗古源修护霜 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
