As of 2026-04-02, GABA's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 保健品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, GABA's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
GABA's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
GABA's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
GABA's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
GABA's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
GABA's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 维维生素D | 47.66% | 12.11% | 8.33% | 19.53% | 3.13% | View Details |
| 护护肝片 | 37.11% | 1.56% | 0% | 13.28% | 8.2% | View Details |
| 复复合维生素 | 17.97% | 1.95% | 1.04% | 6.64% | 5.47% | View Details |
| 钙钙 | 15.23% | 0% | 0% | 1.56% | 0% | View Details |
| 氨氨糖 | 14.84% | 0% | 0% | 5.08% | 1.56% | View Details |
| 维维生素B12 | 10.94% | 0.39% | 0% | 1.56% | 0% | View Details |
| GGABA (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |