As of 2026-03-29, 钙尔奇's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 宠物保健品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 钙尔奇's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
钙尔奇's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
钙尔奇's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
钙尔奇's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
钙尔奇's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
钙尔奇's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 红红狗 | 41.07% | 1.79% | 0% | 41.07% | 14.29% | View Details |
| 麦麦德氏 | 35.71% | 3.57% | 0% | 33.93% | 12.5% | View Details |
| ZZesty Paws | 26.79% | 1.79% | 0% | 23.21% | 3.57% | View Details |
| MMAG | 25% | 0% | 0% | 23.21% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 谷谷登 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 16.07% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 益益生菌 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 钙钙尔奇 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
