As of 2026-04-02, 干预式系列精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 抗老精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 1.82%, below the industry average by 6.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (1.82%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 干预式系列精华's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
干预式系列精华's Mention Rate is 1.82%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
干预式系列精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
干预式系列精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
干预式系列精华's Positive Rate is 1.82%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
干预式系列精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 绯绯悦紧致抗皱精华液 | 18.18% | 7.27% | 14.29% | 18.18% | 1.82% | View Details |
| 谷谷雨山参精华油 | 14.55% | 3.64% | 9.52% | 14.55% | 5.45% | View Details |
| 红红宝石精华 | 12.73% | 0% | 0% | 12.73% | 0% | View Details |
| 双双抗精华 | 10.91% | 0% | 0% | 10.91% | 0% | View Details |
| 小小灯泡精华 | 5.45% | 0% | 0% | 5.45% | 0% | View Details |
| CCE精华 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 干干预式系列精华 (Current Brand) | 1.82% | 0% | 0% | 1.82% | 0% | View Details |
