As of 2026-03-31, Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 高光 category shows: The overall mention rate is 4.17%, above the industry average by 1.4 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (4.17%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's Mention Rate is 4.17%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's Positive Rate is 4.17%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Glowgasm Beauty Light Wand's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMaster Chrome Metallic Highlighter | 6.25% | 0% | 0% | 6.25% | 0% | View Details |
| MMegaGlo Highlighting Powder | 6.25% | 0% | 0% | 6.25% | 0% | View Details |
| MMineralize Skinfinish | 4.17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | View Details |
| BBackstage Glow Face Palette | 4.17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | View Details |
| BBaume Essentiel | 4.17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | View Details |
| TThe Luminizing Face Enhancer | 4.17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | View Details |
| GGlowgasm Beauty Light Wand (Current Brand) | 4.17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | View Details |
