As of 2026-04-03, 《古代汉语通论》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, above the industry average by 0.0 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 2 competitors in the same category, 《古代汉语通论》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《古代汉语通论》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《古代汉语通论》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《古代汉语通论》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《古代汉语通论》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《古代汉语通论》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《西方的形成：人与文化史》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《中国字说》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《古代汉语通论》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
