As of 2026-03-30, 光引精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 光引精华's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
光引精华's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
光引精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
光引精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
光引精华's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
光引精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 谷谷雨净白瓶 | 33.33% | 16.67% | 23.81% | 31.48% | 11.11% | View Details |
| 娇娇韵诗 | 20.37% | 0% | 0% | 16.67% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 城城野医生377 | 20.37% | 0% | 0% | 14.81% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 城城野医生377精华 | 14.81% | 0% | 0% | 14.81% | 5.56% | View Details |
| 悦悦罗兰 | 12.96% | 1.85% | 0% | 11.11% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻 | 11.11% | 0% | 0% | 11.11% | 0% | View Details |
| 光光引精华 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
