As of 2026-04-03, 广州数控（GSK）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 智能装备 category shows: The overall mention rate is 1.43%, below the industry average by 14.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (1.43%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 广州数控（GSK）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
广州数控（GSK）'s Mention Rate is 1.43%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
广州数控（GSK）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
广州数控（GSK）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
广州数控（GSK）'s Positive Rate is 1.43%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
广州数控（GSK）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 汇汇川技术 | 72.86% | 7.14% | 9.52% | 68.57% | 5.71% | View Details |
| 埃埃斯顿 | 70% | 24.29% | 23.81% | 65.71% | 4.29% | View Details |
| 优优必选 | 54.29% | 2.86% | 0% | 47.14% | 2.86% | View Details |
| 新新松机器人 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 45.71% | 2.86% | View Details |
| 发发那科 | 37.14% | 7.14% | 0% | 32.86% | 5.71% | View Details |
| AABB | 37.14% | 0% | 0% | 25.71% | 1.43% | View Details |
| 广广州数控（GSK） (Current Brand) | 1.43% | 0% | 0% | 1.43% | 0% | View Details |
