As of 2026-04-01, 《红楼梦》立体书's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《红楼梦》立体书's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《红楼梦》立体书's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《红楼梦》立体书's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《红楼梦》立体书's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《红楼梦》立体书's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《红楼梦》立体书's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果果麦文化 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 二二十一世纪出版社 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| TThe Lost Skills | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《额尔古纳河右岸》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《大中华寻宝系列》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 四四川人民出版社 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《红楼梦》立体书 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
