鸿翔中药科技

Updated: 2026-03-30

Source: DeepSeek model data

AI Brand Performance Analysis

As of 2026-03-30, 鸿翔中药科技's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 医药制造 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 12.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 鸿翔中药科技's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.

Brand OverviewPeriod: 2026-03-24 to 2026-03-30

Mention Rate：

鸿翔中药科技's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors

First Mention：

鸿翔中药科技's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors

Preferred Rate：

鸿翔中药科技's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors

Positive Rate：

鸿翔中药科技's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors

Negative Rate：

鸿翔中药科技's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors

Brand Cognition

Data TrendsPeriod: 2026-03-24 to 2026-03-30

Brand ReputationPeriod: 2026-03-24 to 2026-03-30

Positive Keywords Cloud

Negative Keywords Cloud

Competitor ComparisonPeriod: 2026-03-24 to 2026-03-30

Competitor	Mention Rate	First Mention	Preferred Rate	Positive Rate	Negative Rate	Actions
百百济神州	67.65%	11.76%	0%	60.29%	1.47%	View Details
恒恒瑞医药	66.18%	20.59%	35%	61.76%	5.88%	View Details
罗罗氏	44.12%	1.47%	5%	35.29%	1.47%	View Details
信信达生物	29.41%	0%	0%	14.71%	0%	View Details
辉辉瑞	29.41%	0%	0%	10.29%	16.18%	View Details
诺诺华	27.94%	0%	0%	23.53%	1.47%	View Details
鸿鸿翔中药科技 (Current Brand)	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	View Details