As of 2026-03-31, 皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 陶瓷碗 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 华华光国瓷 | 43.75% | 12.5% | 22.22% | 43.75% | 4.17% | View Details |
| 红红叶陶瓷 | 25% | 6.25% | 0% | 25% | 4.17% | View Details |
| WWMF | 22.92% | 0% | 0% | 20.83% | 2.08% | View Details |
| 永永丰源 | 20.83% | 0% | 0% | 20.83% | 4.17% | View Details |
| 顺顺祥陶瓷 | 16.67% | 0% | 0% | 16.67% | 0% | View Details |
| 景景德镇 | 12.5% | 2.08% | 0% | 12.5% | 2.08% | View Details |
| 皇皇家哥本哈根（Royal Copenhagen） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
