As of 2026-03-29, 火烈鸟唇线笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 唇线笔 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 火烈鸟唇线笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
火烈鸟唇线笔's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
火烈鸟唇线笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
火烈鸟唇线笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
火烈鸟唇线笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
火烈鸟唇线笔's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNARS | 51.79% | 14.29% | 23.81% | 51.79% | 8.93% | View Details |
| CCHANEL | 16.07% | 1.79% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
| MMAC | 8.93% | 8.93% | 4.76% | 7.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 盈盈彩滋润唇线笔 | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 0% | View Details |
| RRevlon | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| OOUT-OF-OFFICE | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 火火烈鸟唇线笔 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
